Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Rick Anderson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rick Anderson. Show all posts

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Twins Can't Have Cake And Eat It, Too

It's really about time for the niceties to disappear.  It's about time for some feelings to be hurt.  More importantly, the sooner you get your hands dirty, the sooner you can clean them off again.

These are all things the Twins' front office needs to think about in the coming days if they hope to retain any shred of dignity they have left.  Otherwise, they risk losing more than just 100-plus games.  They risk alienating a fan base yearning to fill seats in a new ballpark while enjoying a winning culture.  They also risk tarnishing a reputation of being a model franchise in a small market, competing annually on a budget far less than their top tier competition.

As many have pointed out in the past, what this organization seems to pride itself on are things like competing, rather than winning.  When push comes to shove, the Twins seem to be the ones being pushed, rather than being the ones doing the shoving.

For the greater good of the franchise, sacrifices need to be made.  Accountability must be held, at all levels.

In business, when success isn't being had, it is more often than not the line-level employees who hear the ridicule, feel the pressure, and are ultimately blamed for failure.  It is often easier to change the pieces than to change the message, or start over.  But when a supervisor continues to change those pieces, and the results continue to be the same, at some point, upper management must decide whether it truly is the pieces, or if it's the message being handed down to those pieces.

In the case of the Twins, the pieces have been changed.  Players have been brought in, and players have been dismissed.  New players have been brought in, and still others have been dismissed.  And the fact remains that the results continue to be the same.

It's time for the front office to change the messenger.

For years, we have heard from many within the organization, and many close to it, than Ron Gardenhire is a "players' manager".  We've heard that he never gets too up, and he never gets too down.  He's an even-keel kinda guy who takes the good with the bad.  We've heard that players love to play for him.

Sadly, I don't believe that is still the case.

When success is prominent, as was the case in 2009 and 2010, we hear great things about the coaching staff, mostly from the beat writers, but also from some front office personnel.  Case and point, 2010; the year Gardenhire was awarded the Manager of the Year Award.  We heard about what a great job Gardy did managing this team.  We heard about his ability to "put the puzzle together" and win.  We heard that, when Justin Morneau goes down 82 games into the season, on pace to win his second MVP Award, Gardenhire "made the right move" filling the first base hole with Michael Cuddyer, despite the fact that there really wasn't another logical option at that point.  We heard about the ability of Gardy and his staff (hitting coach Joe Vavra, and pitching coach Rick Anderson) to "get the most out of their guys."  Guys like rookie Danny Valencia (.311, 7 HR, 40 RBI in 85 Games), Delmon Young (.298, 21 HR, 112 RBI), Carl Pavano (17-11, 3.75 ERA), Francisco Liriano (14-10, 3.62 ERA, 201 K), and Kevin Slowey (13-6, 4.45 ERA).

On the flip side, over the last two seasons (2011 and thus far 2012), we've seen the Twins struggle more than at any time in recent memory, including the mid-to-late '90s.  During those struggles, if we're being honest with ourselves, we haven't seen "accountability."  What we've seen is subtle, quiet finger-pointing from  those closest to the situation, from the coaching staff to the beat writers.  We've been told things like: players aren't taking good at-bats, guys aren't getting into good positions out in the field, pitchers aren't throwing to their strengths, etc.

The question that should be asked is: If Gardenhire "made all the right moves" in 2010, and Anderson and Vavra were responsible for "getting the most out of their guys" during that season, why have the last two seasons been about the players' lack of discipline at the plate, or inability to focus on the mound,  or the fact that the team was hit with a massive injury bug?

It appears evident that Gardenhire and his coaching staff truly feel that the players aren't performing up to the standards expected of them, rather than the fact that perhaps they have lost the ability to get those most out of those players.  If even some of the players feel as though the full weight of this losing season is falling on their back, and that the coaching staff is unable to accept their part, then you've already lost them.

In order to show the players that it's not all their doing, the front office needs to show a bit of backbone.  A change within the coaching staff must be made.  That change, even if it is only one, will tell players that upper management doesn't feel like it's 100% your fault.  It will also give players a fresh perspective and a new outlook on the way they approach each game.

At this point, failing to make that change just shows that you're not ready to get rid of some of the pleasantries, that you're still worried about hurting feelings, and frankly, that you'd rather have clean hands and a poor reputation, than dirty hands and optimistic future.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

The Twins Cannot Repeat History

After reading a great article from Star Tribune sports writer Patrick Reusse ("This has all the earmarks of a lengthy Twins dive"), I realized how familiar this Twins season is becoming.  Reusse is spot on with his observations, and quite honestly, it's scary to truly see the similarities between the Twins of the mid-90's and the current iteration.

Hopefully, however, this current version of the Twins, both players and front office alike, will learn from the mistakes of their predecessors, and re-write history.

As fans, we have to believe that what we're seeing in 2011 is nothing more than the anomaly.  The debacle that has been the 2011 season is nothing more than a season filled with incredibly bad luck, right?  I mean, the injury issues alone couldn't reproduce themselves again in 2012, could they?  There's really no way possible that the Twins big guns can't get back to their usual MVP selves, is there?

The problem is that, unless the organization decides to be proactive and do something, what Reusse speaks about will become gospel in 2012 and beyond.  So, what can the team realistically do?

For starters, let's assume the major injuries of 2011 resolve themselves this offseason.  Justin Morneau, Joe Mauer, and Denard Span will all be back at 100% at the start of Spring Training.  Let's just pretend, for a moment, that the Twins are able to re-sign both Michael Cuddyer and Jason Kubel to solidify the core of the lineup, as well as come to terms with Joe Nathan on a multi-year deal that will enable Joe to end his career with the Twins, as it appears he wants to do.  And lastly, let's also say, for argument's sake, that the banged up starting rotation returns from their myriad of arm issues.  Assuming all of these things, where are the areas for the Twins to make significant changes to ensure that 2011 was nothing more than a minor speed bump?

One glaring hole needing immediate resolution going into the 2012 season is the middle infield, specifically the shortstop position.  After choosing to not bring back J.J. Hardy after the 2010 season in favor of the unknown and unproven Tsuyoshi Nishioka, the Twins took a major step back.  Oddly enough, the Twins front office felt Hardy's injury problems were too much to invest another year in, opting instead to let him go in trade to the Orioles.  Should they feel the same way about most of the injured 2011 roster, we may be in complete rebuilding mode.  In 2009, the Twins made a late-season trade to acquire Orlando Cabrera to bring some veteran stability to an important position, but decided his price tag was too high for 2010, instead signing Hardy.  The problematic pattern presenting itself in this case seems that the Twins are unwilling to pay for stability at a very important position.  The current options at shortstop are Trevor Plouffe and Nishioka.  Plouffe has shown some signs of being a viable offensive solution at short, but his defense leaves quite a bit to be desired.  Nishioka needs a major overhaul, both offensively and defensively.  Until that happens, "Nishy" should be relegated to nothing but utility duty.  Finding a solid veteran shortstop, either through trade or on the free agent market, should be a priority for the Twins to give themselves at least a couple of options going into spring.

Another hole needing attention is that of the bullpen.  Middle relief was a major hurdle to overcome for this squad, particularly from the likes of Jose Mijares and Alex Burnett.  Combined, the two relievers had an ERA near 5.00, striking out 61 batters while walking 51.  Not the poster children for reliability, that's for sure.  Mijares lost his late inning specialty role to Glen Perkins, who was seemingly the only bright spot in the bullpen this season.  The middle relief roles, both right and left-handed, occupied by Burnett and Mijares respectively, need to be re-cast.  Given the free agent market for relief pitchers in 2012, this might have to occur through trade.  Regardless of how it gets done, the Twins need to address this pressing issue before pitchers and catchers report in February.

The last area needing to be seriously looked at in order to avoid a long spell of sub-par seasons is one which wasn't considered back in 1993.  It's not an easy option to consider, but it should be something at least discussed.  That option is a change in the coaching staff.  Back in 1993, Tom Kelly was in his seventh full season as the manager of the Twins.  It was hard to argue with two World Series titles in five seasons, so it seemed understandable that a change at the helm didn't need to be made right away.  The coaches, however, could've possibly been shaken up a bit.  With Tony Olivia retiring as the Twins' hitting coach after the 1991 season, Terry Crowley took over.  Again, it might've seemed a bit rash to replace Crowley after only two season as the team's hitting instructor.  Dick Such remained the team's pitching coach through the 2000 season.  It's possible that a change there might have sparked something with the pitching staff, but it's difficult to say.

Fast forward to 2011, and we have a different coaching scenario than we had back in 1993, when the run of losing seasons began for the Twins.  Now, we have two members of the coaching staff, hitting coach Joe Vavra, and pitching coach Rick Anderson, who have been in their positions six and eleven years, respectively.  With the exception of an increase between 2007 into 2008, the Twins, as a team, have seen declines in batting average, hits, and runs under Vavra.  Vavra is the second-longest tenured hitting coach in all of baseball, behind only Mickey Hatcher of the Los Angeles Angels.  Similarly, Anderson has the third longest tenure amongst pitching coaches behind Dave Duncan of the Cardinals and Dave Righetti of the Giants.  Before things get too out of hand, as they did in 1993, it may be wise for the Twins front office to decide to take the leadership of the team into a different direction.

2012 does not need to be the "end of the world" for the Twins, pun intended.  It will only end up that way if the team decides to allow it to happen.  Let's hope, for the sake of the players and fans, the decision is to erase 2011 from our memories by repeating the feat of the 1991 team, that being to finish in last place the year before contending for the title.